Peer Response to Vika Brovarska

The best feature of his paragraph is its clear structure.
The format of the paragraph is correct.
There is a topic sentence, which is quite clear and has a controlling idea. But it is not organized according to main rules (instead of “Capital - accumulative resources or work” should be “Capital – is an accumulative resources or work”).
Also there are some supporting sentences, the main idea in which is also clear. These supporting sentences are relevant to a topic sentence, support it.
Still, there is no concluding sentence, which, I believe, should be added for more complex comprehension of the subject.
Generally, all sentences flow smoothly, but sentence “Capital could have not only materialized, but incorporated forms” is a little bit unclear and falls out of a logical pattern. Probably, some transitional words should be added.
Also I’ve noticed a few errors in grammar (instead of ‘separate peoples’ should be (separate people’s, also there should be a coma after ‘it means’).