11.4.13

Belopolska research paper (without oultine and literature)



Role of Women in Prehistoric Societies

The XX century witnessed dramatic changes in political, economic and social life, which, in its turn, brought about certain changes in social status and functions of man and especially woman. As a result of such changes, more women can be now seen in governments and top management, this evolution being inevitable. Transferring a wit “Capture the gist!” by Kozma Prutkov, a wise man of Russian literature, the gist of this evolution can be seen in the prehistoric times, when social functions of people started to form due to some physiological and cultural aspects. Namely social function of women and its development is the main issue under consideration.

What is a woman? According to the Wikipedia article on “Woman” it is
“a female human. The term woman is usually reserved for an adult, with the term girl
being the usual term for a female child or adolescent. However, the term woman is
also sometimes used to identify a female human, regardless of age, as in phrases such
as "Women's rights". Unlike men, women are typically capable of giving birth.” (Wikipedia: Woman) 
Paraphrased, the definition of a woman can be suggested as follows:  a woman is a human being of a female sex who differs from a man according to several criteria: physiological (constitution: size, primary and secondary sex characters), psychological (she is more sensitive and sentimental, more emotional and intuitive) and social (the place in society and social role).
To learn women’s social role and its evolution one should address some sciences specially designed for reconstruction of old environment. Thus, the relics of the prehistoric times unearthed by archaeologists serve a premise on the basis of which social relations of the primitive society can be reconstructed ethnographically (Zalizniak 119 - 128).

Thus, the first wide ethnographic reconstructions of this kind performed by Boris Symchenko refer to Upper Paleolithic (14 - 10 ka BP)  and Mesolithic(10 – 8 ka BP). He examined the actual life of such arctic people as Nganasan, Yukaghir and Sami who still preserve the life style similar to the same of the prehistoric hunters. He found out that according to the function of women in society Nganasan people, for example, divide women in three age groups. The youngest women, or kopto, not married and without children, help to look after the latter and dress meat. It is prohibited for them to make clothes to married men, children or even to their unmarried brothers. Their main function is to store wood for fire.  Ny women, or those who are married and have children, work with meat of dead deer and the skin, store food, make clothes and the covering for summer lodging. The ethnographer underlines the more respectful attitude to the eldest women, inie, who are responsible for solving conflicts and food distribution. They approve marriages; ensure celebration activities, sacred and social rules (Symchenko 91). In other words, if the ethnographically obtained data is transferred to ancient hunting societies, a Stone Age woman had a wide range of responsibilities for her family such as dressing the game, cooking meals, making clothes, and other activities. To compare them with a man’s responsibilities, these were not jobs but just domestic chores. 

Conversely, a man was the main and sole bread winner of the family as it was he who hunted wild animals to provide food. A man’s death or physical incapacity meant starvation and even death of the whole family. The essential social function of a man in the prehistoric times can hardly be argued (Zalizniak 119 - 128). Although, ethnography witnesses that the Arctic Men did not possess the hunted food in Arctic societies. As it is proved ethnographically, the prey belonged to women. It was prohibited to a man to touch a killed animal (Symchenko 98).

Still, due to the change of the climate the life of prehistoric people had to be adapted to it. If in Upper Paleolithic with its constant coldness life of people was rather stable – reindeer made the migration on the same bankside twice a year for centuries; in snowy winters of Mesolithic the hunters had to chase savage animals (Zalizniak 160). The climate influenced not only the way of hunting and lifestyle in general; social function of women also underwent some changes.
AS it can be see, when the common main women responsibilities remained the same during the whole prehistoric and even historic times, still the following differences can be observed.  As Upper Paleolithic women mostly sat in their lodging watching fire and preparing food, their winter lifestyle was rather calm and passive. In contrast, the whole winter Mesolithic women changed their camp; they had to gather portative lodging and all the equipment to move to their husbands who hunted some animals to eat. Women carried the luggage themselves on special sledges.  The second main difference is connected with women’s responsibilities in their community. When Upper Paleolithic women had only to dress the reindeer meat during the hunting season (the meat provided by men), Mesolithic women started to provide food to the community themselves: they gathered berries, nut, and eggs of wild birds (Zalizniak 167). Comparing the two Stone Age periods and taking into account all mentioned above, we can stay that if some primarily women function were the same both in Final Paleolithic and Mesolithic, their social function in the community became more active and acquired some new productive features.
When researching ethnography, not only society, but also spiritual life and outlook can be analyzed. Thus, Lyudmila Zhukova (2003) underlines that the folklore reflects the transmission from the hunting Mesolithic economy to Neolithic economy of production. She is sure that it is only due to severe Siberian climate and the distance of the district modern population of Central and East Siberia have practically the same lifestyle as their ancestry had about 5 thousand years ago.  In the great amount of so-called religious verses or appeals to some supernatural powers, collected by ethnographer Vladimir Jochelson in the Arctic societies, a reader can notice such protectors and assistants as Mother of Ice, Mother of Land, Mother of Water and other female characters. If practically all vital elements of nature are represented in pagan outlook of Arctic people by female creatures, the fact serves for the important attitude to women in their communities.
Still, when considering the question of specific social function of women in the Paleolithic archaeological materials cannot be ignored. These are numerous statuettes of so-called Paleolithic Venus – small figures made mostly from sort stone, bones of mammoth or other animals. The figurines are known to have exaggerated womanly features (hips, breasts and belly), this fact given a number of interpretations by scientists (Stoliar157) (Appendix 1). 
Thuswise, Sara M. Nelson (2012) tried to analyze more common logical explications of the Venus origin. She underlines that the twelve researches (Bamouw, 1978; Campbell, 1988; Chard, 1975; Clark, 1977; Eddy, 1984; Fagan, 1986; Hester and Grady, 1982; Jurmain, 1981; Pfeiffer, 1985; Poiriee, 1987; Smith, 1976; Wenke, 1984) indicate four main ideas in their studies. These ideas are fertility, Goddess or cult, erotic meaning and some artistic or stylized masterpiece. Chart 1 shows the relations between these probable meanings studied by the suggested scientists. The vertical axis shows the general number of the researcher who admit this or that meaning presented by the horizontal axis. As it can be seen from the chart, nine scientists out of twelve believe that Venus figurines reveal some fertility symbols when six persons stay that the statuettes are artistic or stylized masterpieces. Five authors agree that the statuettes are Paleolithic erotic symbols as well as five ones believe they appeared due to some Cult or mean a Goddess. 

Chart 1
 

It should be admitted that when the question of the figurines function remains disputable, no male figurines were found.
To sum up everything said above, the mutually beneficial it their functions alliance “man-woman” was established by prehistoric people, with the roles performed by the partners being predetermined by their physiological nature and later fixed socially. The Paleolithic and Mesolithic women were primarily responsible for keeping the family hearth – doing household chores, bringing up children and, last but not least, providing inspiration to men. This information could serve a message of wisdom to those contemporary women who wish to reconsider human values and their attitudes towards family and career.



Appendix 1
 

Paleolithic Venus figurines (according to Aleksandr Markov 2011)
 

 

No comments: