Ethical issues in a sociological research
Arguments
|
Counterarguments
|
Rebuttal
|
●
informed consent very often prevents people from taking part in a
research
|
●
many unprotected categories of people may be “used” by a researcher
|
● the rights of unprotected categories must be defended, but without exaggerated
bureaucratism
|
●
positive impacts of a research for the common well being
|
● some individuals may suffer from the research
|
●
a sociologist must always weigh possible positive and negative impacts
|
Ethical
issues play an important role in any sociological research, but there is much
evidence that strict regulations, such as present in the USA, can hurt the
research in particular and further development of the sociological science as a whole. Many
human rights protectors, for example Freedman and Cassel, claim that the informed consent is the
only correct decision. Their concern can
be understood, because some vulnerable categories of people, such as homeless,
elderly, drug-addicts, might suffer from an improper use of their personal
data. However, human rights protectors ignore the fact that a lot of people become suspicious after they are asked to sign an informed consent. As a
result, in many cases respondents refuse to take part in the research, which
makes response rates even lower than usual. Therefore, sociologists have to
balance between two extremes and find the way to defend vulnerable categories
of people without making it another bureaucratic procedure. On the other hand,
some studies influence people’s lives too much, and it is another concern of the informed consent proponents. Some studies undoubtedly make a big impact on the lives of
individuals; but, what is even more important, some of these studies have positive
results to the whole society. That is why, all researchers have to weigh
possible positive and negative impacts of their studies. For instance, if a group of researchers found ways illegal immigrants get into a country, they might be faced
with a choice: either to tell the authorities or not. They would choose between
the prosperity of his country, and the individual fate. This situation is an
illustration for the ethical issues every researcher has to face. It also shows
that if the informed consent had been needed, this research team would have never come to their findings.
For more information refer to: Thorne, Barrie. "You Still Takin' Notes?" Fieldwork and Problems of Informed Consent Social Problems, Vol. 27, No. 3, Ethical Problems of Fieldwork (Feb., 1980), pp. 284-297.
2 comments:
Critical Response. Musina Valentyna
The presented above paragraph is strong in the main idea argumentation, paper format, and coherence. Immediately, the paragraph has a colorful illustration that facilitates the perception of the text. Furthermore, the paragraph has a clear topic sentence, because the main idea is put at the beginning of the sentence as an attention getter. Moreover, the area of analysis, social science, is defined straight away. Besides, the support is presented by different types of examples and several explanations and descriptions; however, the supporting sentences lack expert estimation: statistical data or quotes of respectful researchers in social science. Nevertheless, all the presented details in the support directly relate to the main idea and are built clearly. The concluding sentence as a single sentence is absent; though, several last sentences have an appropriate end-of-paragraph signal. In general, the paragraph is convincing and smooth.
Post a Comment