Why Social Networks Are More Good Than Evil
Argument
|
Counterargument
|
Rebuttal
|
Social networks (SN)
keep a person online with his or her friends
|
They provoke
addiction to online communication instead of live one
|
SN are the same
means of communication like phones. They do not replace live relations, but
make one’s friends close even if they dwell far away
|
A person can be express
oneself in SN more frankly than in real live where his or her modesty or complexes
may hinder.
|
Exaggerated publicity
in SN often causes problems: other people see or read what they should not
have and this entails consequences in real world
|
To avoid ethical and
other problems one has to observe the same
proprieties as in the real life
|
There are a lot of
interest communities to everyone’s taste
|
Too much diverse
information takes a lot of time and sucks down so that one becomes attached
to the computer
|
Problems of control
appear to people with weak will or lazy who are eager to seek only for extra leisure opportunity
|
Social networks
like Facebook, Vkontakte et cetera have become a useful multifunctional instrument
available for everyone connected to the Internet. One of the most important reasons of their
popularity is their function to keep friends always on-line. Critics remark
that social networks create addiction to on-line communication and decrease personal
contact. It should be said, that social
networks are almost the same means of communication as telephone, but nobody
accuse telephones of such problems. Like them social networks do not replace
live relations, but make one’s friends and colleagues closer even if they dwell
far away. Also social networks allow a person various possibilities for self-expression.
One can transcend his or her modesty and communicate without limitations; there
are plenty of virtual interest communities to everyone’s taste where a person
can be engaged. Of course, we should admit that there is the other side of the
coin: unfamiliar people can become acquainted with personal data of a user, and
torrents of diverse information can tear away from the real world. But there
are uncomplicated ways of oneself control.
To avoid ethical troubles one has to observe the same proprieties as in
the real life, i.e. not to do anything one would not do in public. As regards
to information quags, this problem appears mostly to lazy people who are eager
to seek only for extra leisure opportunity. Really engaged and serious individuals
do not waste their time because they know their priorities. In spite of their
drawbacks social networks create friendly relations inside humankind, contribute
to self-education and self-expression, and help to change social reality which
often would be impossible without them.
No comments:
Post a Comment