16.2.13

Comparison and contrast essay. Igor Bigun


"Fahrenheit 451" and "1984"

The “Fahrenheit 451” by Ray Bradbury and “1984” by George Orwell  are the masterpieces of antiutopia devoted to the phenomenon of totalitarianism.  They were published at almost the same time, when one totalitarian state had collapsed but another still existed. Thus in spite of using  fantasy stories, both novels were allusions on the terrific and bitter experience of the really existed regimes . Both compositions were included into the gold fund of antiutopias and films were made after these novels.  Let us see how the authors , managed to frame their warnings in words and images.
The “Fahrenheit 451” and “1984” both tell us stories of a man who lives in future and works for a public agency. In the first case it is a “fireman” Guy Montag and in the second Winston Smith.  At first they sincerely obey their duties in favor of their societies. The society of Montag is the one where reading and keeping books is forbidden. The fire brigades seek for books all over country and burn them right  on the spot.  Fahrenheit 451 is exactly the temperature of paper inflammation.  Books produce thoughts and emotions which provoke anxiety and conflicts that is why they are to be destroyed and their owners condemned. The main sources of information and means of communication are TV and pictures. Simultaneously, Smith works for the Ministry of Truth of Oceania, a great power lead by the Big Brother and the Party. Everybody is obliged to love the Leader and to believe in the Party and everything they say. Those who are not faithful enough are criminals and should be prosecuted. The most terrible crime is a thoughtcrime which demands only capital punishment.  The Ministry which Winston works for falsifies even its own yesterday's newspapers. We see that both men belong to the countries where the most banned things are critical thinking and personal individuality.
Once upon women appear in the life of each character. They make Montag and Smith feel emotional splashes and have doubts in dominating doctrines. Smith falls in love with Julia and Montag makes friends with Klarissa. And in the end both men become criminals themselves according to their countries’ laws. The former man dates with a woman and joins the conspiracy against the government and the latter becomes a book-reader. These activities are strictly forbidden.
 But totalitarian societies distinguish themselves by encouraging snitching even on the intimate people. Montag’s wife informes  his command on his “crimes” and Winston and Julia are betrayed by their landlord. The theme of betrayal is central in both stories to tell us that all dictatorships ground on the divide and rule strategy and make their citizens each other’s enemies. There is no privacy under such regimes which try to control even the innermost.
The further fates of Montag and Smith are contrastly different. On one hand, the former fireman burns his commander and escapes to the backwoods, where other exiles who do not obey the repressive laws live. This alternative community’s lifestyle is close to the nature, free from consumerism, hard-heartedness and stupidity of the official culture. On the other hand, the secret police of Oceania tortures Winston Smith and breaks him down so that he rejects his views, his girlfriend and becomes a typical dull citizen loyal to the Party and the Big Brother.
Both stories have similar plots but  completely contrasting endings. In spite of that the message is the same: totalitarianism cannot be humane or  ”necessary” for a noble goal – it should be eliminated as a whole and the true human life is when people develop their knowledge, experience frank emotions and live in harmony with nature. 

No comments: