ACR paragraph.
Mariya Levonova.
|
argument
|
counterargument
|
rebuttal
|
|
Impressionism is an only movement in modern art
contradicting state-controlled art evolution by changing both content and technical
aspects.
|
Post-impressionism is another anti-system movement
objecting also Impressionists’ ideas.
|
Both Impressionism and Post-impressionism was
opponent to current art situation and were similar at regarding aesthetic as a critical aspect of meaning
and paying central attention to color.
|
Conversations on
modern art in conditions of overwhelming possibilities to collect, share, and
revise information received usually require a certain level of competence. Usually
people do not distinguish between impressionism and post-impressionism[1] which
may be regarded as normal, if the public is not acquainted with the topic or embarrassing
if vice versa. Impressionist painters rejected the tendency to illustrate some
past events close to reality and invented a new trend providing a possibility
to create masterpieces on the basis of current time lifestyle implementing technics allowing expressing fleeting effect of light, atmosphere and
movement. Post-impressionism is a movement which began simultaneously
with impressionism and was a reaction of Vincent van Gogh, Paul Cézanne, and
Paul Gauguin, who judged such representatives of new trend as Edgar Degas,
Claude Monet, Frédéric Bazille, and Auguste Renoir, for performing light and
colors so impulsive and proposed to emphasize on symbolism, formality and
structural issues. Nevertheless, despite existing differences both branches of
modern art refused from affectation of the painting, treated color to be
independent from composition and regarded aesthetic as a critical aspect of meaning.
Every person who takes a risk to begin speaking on art movements should
take into consideration most bright nuances of art evolution.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment