A-C-R paragraph Evseeva Evgenia
ARGUMENT
|
COUNTERARGUMENT
|
REBUTTAL
|
virtual space guarantees safety for solving conflicts
|
disputes in the net have negative emotional impact
|
violence in the net is less severe than in real life
|
way of increasing self-esteem
|
self identity in virtual environment does not
match with the real life
|
more chances that people will support your
opinion in the net
|
In contrast to social relations in the material world, which are handled according to conventional norms and laws, communication in the Internet has no regulations. That is why issue of violence
and verbal aggression is so common in virtual space. Despite its negative features, Internet violence has a
positive impact on Internet users and proves to be a secure way to express
discontent.
As
conflicts are inevitable part of human life, it is safer for the person to
overcome some quarrel through the net than go through it in the real life. Still, it should be remembered that emotional disputes in a public
area network (chat rooms, and forums) are often degenerated
from a conflict to psychological terror. Unexpected hostile and abusive attacks lead to strong emotional suffering of the victim. However, according to
the numerous findings of scholars, the manifestation of violence through the
net is less severe and emotionally harmful for the person than the abuse in the
real life. Firstly, there is no risk to be wounded or killed. Secondly, people experience humiliation on the
Internet much easier than when
talking to the abuser face-to -face. Online users allow themselves to show aggression and fuel conflicts on the forums, thereby increasing self-esteem and the importance of their own point of view.On the other hand, in such a way people may build
illusions about their own personality, when their self-identity in virtual
space does not correspond to their actual identity in the real life, which
often results in discrepancy and depression. Nevertheless, there are more
chances to find the radical proponent of some opinion in the net among hundreds
of users, who can view the articulation of this standpoint than search for them
among the restricted number of people in the social surrounding.
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). The effects of media violence on society.
Science, (295)
2377–2379.
1 comment:
The best feature of Evgenia's paragraph is its lucidity and ellegant structure. Moreover, the illustration is a convenient way to understand main points of the paragraph. The most important idea is stated in the topic sentence, and the other sentences give a strong support of this idea. However, the conclusion is absent. Instead, Evgenia's last sentence is an attempt to make a rebuttal, which is, however, not connected to the counterargument. It would be better if Evgenia added an appropriate rebuttal, and a proper concluding sentence.
All in all, this paragraph is easy to understand, pleasant to read, and interesting to reflect upon. Thank you!
Post a Comment